Fishing Boat Flooring

the "New Covenant" INTELLECTUALS AGAINST "ZIONIST"

To some intellectuals, Alain Badiou as Edgar Morin or Noam Chomsky, the advent of a better world faces two obstacles. According to them, democracy is an avatar of fascism and the Jews themselves as the eternal victims of the Holocaust to oppress the Palestinians.
By David Reinharc

Noam Chomsky receiving a gift from Nabil Qaouq, leader of Hezbollah in Lebanon, imprisoned by the Israelis in Khiam, near the town of Nabatieh (May 2006).

U No observation, first: the twentieth century seems to have sounded the death knell of utopias, the main incarnation was communism. Some euphoric dreams (the cons-American culture, May 68) could not overcome the disaster. Uncertainty, relativity of human things, doubt, perplexity even before the world to be born to discover, again, as the true ontological dimension of man. For once, the term - as echoing the ominous "they would need a good war" - the terrible vow, "they would have a good Utopia." We live in this when, to paraphrase Kafka, "their hind legs again stick" disappointed with the promise of emancipation of the man of yesterday, without "their forepaws have yet been made " in this future paradise on earth coveted. In short, Godot will not come: the hope of a qualitative leap into a totally different reality, this expectation vain that knows no rest or peace, never will be fulfilled in the final outcome. But this is impossible, a fringe radical intellectuals wants nothing to do. They operate in their pharmacies ideological return force in the hope of a passage from darkness to light. Is brewing in the cauldrons intend to end it yad'humain in man, that is to say the wrong bacillus find the right remedy to seek. Impossible, the deck is stacked as a barrier hampers the path of humanity towards its final fulfillment. Because to go from "old, deep past" to a brighter future, the apparent impotence of liberalism in the « hypothèse communiste » (Badiou), pour jouir de ce « printemps de notre seconde naissance » (Jankélévitch), il faut que la Shoah n’ait jamais eu lieu. Le raisonnement est impeccable : si l’on veut recréer de l’utopie et tenir bon sur la promesse d’une ère nouvelle qui viendrait arracher, effacer, détruire un monde ancien assimilé en bloc au Mal, il faut exposer clairement que tous les pouvoirs d’hier et d’aujourd’hui se valent. Et qu’il n’y a pas de différence entre fascisme et démocratie, qu’on jettera ensemble dans la same dustbin of history. But if their apparent differences are merely folklore without consequences, what about the existence of gas chambers? Only the extermination of Jews can be distinguished. In fact, this "technicality" for radical intellectuals, opposed the losers - the Nazis - the Americans responsible for the Iraq war, communists, and guilty of the Katyn gulag, or the French, the massacre of Setif. Denying the Holocaust is prohibited liberal democracies to say that despite their horror, they were a lesser evil. Capitalism liberalism = = Democracy = Nazism, the equation would have been perfect if Hitler had been a good and consistent agent of capitalism. But if the Nazi concentration camp is the site of a capitalist exploitation, how is it that the Nazis planned the extermination of Jews, thus depriving themselves of a workforce infinitely profitable? The gas chambers were wasting the labor force are incompatible with the nature of capital. How then destroy the argument of modern democracy that wants to make it appear as "the worst regimes to the exclusion of all other " antithesis of barbarism, while capitalism cleared the crimes of dictatorships and totalitarian states? The operation will be, not to say the Jews were "exterminated", which would be the denial (which is frowned upon and punishable in addition by law), but to state: "Jews" were exterminated Regarding the "negative-Zionism" by a wand semantics, you're in the camp of the oppressed. By changing up the quotes, voila: the Jew does not exist, the Jew, it's Mr. Everybody, you, me, was the Christ, and what are the Palestinians.

Israel, anti-Semitic State ...
Mission impossible? Apparently, only. Alain Badiou writes in scope of the word "Jew" the name Jew is an illusion, its future is disappearing. Interference in the most total, the carnival of all concepts, Badiou does everything in reverse: Israel is a state-Semitic, because the word "Jew" finds its meaning in metaphysics Hitler Holocaust is a Nazi film and in response to the rebuttal of his book by Eric Marty, he writes: "The Jew is me. " Cécile Winter, in the same work - except that" the denial of Jewish "does not appear on the cover - proclaims that the word" Jew "is the " master signifier new Aryan. " Jean-Luc Godard said the same, word for word: "The Jew is me. " And in his film Our music after photo of a Jewish deportee, with the inscription "Jew" is that of a walking corpse behind fences, captioned "Muslim." In an interview with Inrocks (No. 581, May 5, 2004 ), it annoyed: "People told me:" But it's disgusting, because history Palestinians is not Holocaust of the Jews. " But if I write" Muslim "because at Auschwitz, the Jews were called Muslims. Then Hollywood called the Mecca of cinema. " To turn passepasse semantics, we applauded. In the same reversal of victimhood device, Edgar Morin is doing very well: "The Jews of Israel, descendants of victims of an apartheid ghetto named, ghettoïsent Palestinians. The Jews who were humiliated, despised, persecuted, humiliated, despised, persecuted the Palestinians. The Jews who were victims of a pitiless order impose their pitiless order on the Palestinians. The Jewish victims of inhumanity show a terrible inhumanity. Jews scapegoats for every evil "goatee émissarisent" Arafat and the Palestinian Authority. " We will be grateful to philosopher Giorgio Agamben offer us a variation on this theme. In his book state of emergency, it says emergency rule is the rule politics in the West - Nazism and democracy is the same thing, always, c ' is the exception that dominates the rule - and wrote about the situation of terrorist prisoners at Guantanamo Bay: "The only possible comparison is the legal position of Jews in the Nazi Lager, who lost, with citizenship, any identity legal, but at least kept the Jews. "We should also mention Noam Chomsky, the intellectual reference auditors Daniel Mermet on France Inter, with the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu divides the world into two dominant / dominated (in which camp is looking for Israel ... ) and violently denounced, putting them all in the same bag, journalists, scholarly experts, academics, sank into a sort of conspiracy theory. in Israel, Palestine, United States: the fateful triangle and Pirates and Emperors: International Terrorism in today's world , Chomsky thus portrayed Israel as a terrorist state, having "points of similarity" with Nazi Germany. During his speech on the occasion of the award of the German Book Trade Peace, the future author of Death of a Critic Martin Walser denounces "the instrumentalization of the Holocaust" and offers "turns Page Auschwitz. " And it may even be swollen breast of the noble sentiment of universal consciousness that the good Jewish name will be cleared: "Victims Auschwitz are, par excellence, the delegates from our memory all victims of history " (Paul Ricoeur). In short, lots of people to address the Jews an intolerable injunction, they can not make a blackmail: bury your dead bury the funeral, or we will blow ourselves this lock, dam cons utopia d a changeover between the world of yesterday - democracies and totalitarian states united, therefore - and enchanted future. Deleuze already said Eric Marty, had put the idea of the need to evacuate our real Political fascism in the 1930s, became "old fascism," and ask instead the concept of "neo-fascism" in which "it is not difficult recognize the traditional caricature of the United States " (Marty). Still, one wonders why this relentless desire to wipe Israel off the map. The philosopher Etienne Balibar, who wrote that Israel bears the "seeds of disaster" (Le Monde, August 19 2006), Edgar Morin, as his article in the same newspaper ( June 4, 2002): "Israel-Palestine: The Cancer", the metaphor of "biologically based" Zionist intellectuals negative leaves think there is only one obstacle to the delivery of paradise on earth: again, the Jews. Adrien Barrot, moreover, denounces in his book If a Jew ? (Michalon) the logic of this thought, which led to see the Jews as a complication to the advent the best of worlds that their disappearance is pure necessity. And as Bourdieu uses the quote from the Nazi philosopher Carl Schmitt on liberalism characterized as "policy of depoliticization" said Bernard-Henri Levy, borrow him the figure of "kacheton" that prevents , retains the end. And this figure of the "timer" the best of worlds, asking that an "objective chance", he is Jewish.

The refusal of all the dogmas of Judaism
For the Gachnochi doctor has reason to say that if Judaism has always aroused the hatred, it's probably because of its "opposition to idolatry," latter being understood not only in material sense but also, and above all, as opposition to the dogmas. In his speech Jerusalem , Milan Kundera quotes this beautiful Jewish proverb: "Man thinks, God laughs. But the ideologues and intellectuals negative Zionists do not want to hear the echo of the "laughter of God", which means that 'man and think that the truth eludes him " (Kundera). What dream of philosophers like Alain Badiou is the reign of the same, that is to say a world without subjects, where all men, matriculation N +1 in an infinite sequence of interchangeable individuals , all think the same thing. However, Judaism, inspired by the "laughter of God" rejects ideological certainties. "What Christianity, Islam, Marxism, anti-globalization, but also" consumerist ideology "can not stand in Judaism is that it continues to pose issues that all these beliefs, or simply ways of living and thinking consider, explicitly or implicitly, as solved " says Dr. Gachnochi. Among these intellectuals in mind theoretical thinkers of Totality, rejecting Western culture and its respect for the individual, and "laughter of God" taught by Judaism, there is no peace. Similarly, specifically, that there can be no possible agreement between the intellectuals who have nega-Zionist Jews and the answer that question. Because it could be said of Judaism writes Kundera about the "wisdom of the novel" "Like Penelope, he defeated overnight tapestry that theologians, philosophers, scientists have concocted the night before" (The Art of the Novel , Gallimard). And what happens when it is, as Guy Sorman, an ideologue sure to hold the Truth? We consider calmly a "realistic scenario" about Jews: "Perhaps it is their work completed and the time is ripe for them they leave us? "(The Children of Rifaa , 2003). God he laughs yet when he hears that "a new Holocaust [is] possible" (Sorman)?
DR

Jewish Tribune No. 36